DAILY NEWS Jan 7, 2013 11:17 AM - 1 comment

US EPA finalizes solid waste incineration standards

Nationwide cost for complying is approximately $275 million per year

TEXT SIZE bigger text smaller text
By: SWR Staff
January 7, 2013 2013-01-07

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has finalized clean air standards for major and area source boilers and Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI).

In a December 20, 2012 announcement, the EPA said the new standards under the Clean Air Act regulate emissions of mercury and other toxic pollutants from industrial boilers, incinerators, and cement kilns.

There are approximately 106 solid waste incinerators that burn waste at commercial or industrial facilities in the US, the EPA says. The new standards will reduce emissions of harmful pollutants including mercury, lead, cadmium, nitrogen dioxide and particle pollution.

With all units complying, the EPA estimates that the final standards will reduce emissions of metals and dioxins by about five tonnes per year, emissions of acid gases (HCl and SO2) by 7,000 tonnes per year, emissions 2 of PM by 2,400 tonnes per year, emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) by 5,400 tonnes per year and emissions of CO by 20,000 tonnes per year.  

The EPA says that if all 106 units currently in operation use add-on controls to adjust to the new standards, the total nationwide cost for complying is approximately $275 million per year.

The estimated benefits associated with reduced exposure to fine particles are into the hundreds of millions by 2015.

The EPA estimates that for every dollar spent to reduce these pollutants, the public will see $13 to $29 in health benefits, including fewer instances of asthma, heart attacks and premature deaths.

According to the EPA, 99 per cent of the approximately 1.5 million boilers operating in the US will not be affected by the changes, or will be able to meet the new standards by conducting periodic maintenance or regular tune-ups.

The new rules set numerical emission limits for less than one per cent of boilers — those that emit the majority of pollution from the sector.

The EPA established or revised standards for four subcategories of CISWI units in the 2011 CISWI rule: incinerators; small remote incinerators; ERUs; and waste-burning kilns.

The 2011 CISWI rule also included two subcategories of ERUs. In 2012, the EPA further subcategorized ERUs and subcategorized waste-burning kilns based on design type differences. The final rule includes three subcategories of ERUs and separate CO limits for two subcategories of wasteburning kilns.

The final standards include adjusted monitoring provisions, particularly for carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate matter (PM).

  • EPA is removing the oxygen correction requirements for CO emission limits during periods of startup and shutdown and retaining full-load stack test requirements for CO coupled with continuous oxygen monitoring.
  • EPA is requiring PM continuous parametric monitoring systems (CPMS) for all waste-burning kilns and for large energy recovery units (ERUs) (those with an annual heat input greater than 250 MMBtu).

The 2012 final rule makes certain revisions to the final “Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units,” 76 FR 15704 (March 21, 2011),

In general, the final rule establishes revised numeric emission limits for some new and existing CISWI units for certain of the nine pollutants listed in section 129(a)(4) of the CAA.

 The nine pollutants under section 129 are: PM, SO2, HCl, NOX, CO, Pb, Cd, Hg, D/F. CAA section 129(a)(4).

The EPA says existing CISWI units will need to comply with the CISWI standards no later than three years after EPA approves a state plan or five years after the publication date of these final amendments, whichever is earlier.



Horizontal ruler

Reader Comments

Most recent firstOldest first

Bryan Ray

RCBC Waste To Energy System

State of the Art in Converting Municipal Waste to Electricity


*The RCBC Waste To Energy System is the only economically viable solution for eliminating municipal solid waste that is commercially available today and has been proven to meet air quality standards. *

The RCBC Waste To Energy System can deliver a “No-Landfill” means of eliminating municipal garbage while producing income more than sufficient to pay for itself.

The System accepts municipal solid waste (garbage), extracts recyclable materials and combusts the remainder to create steam that drives a standard turbine-generator to make electricity. The system reduces the garbage to an inert ash to produce a product that can be used as construction fill or soil improvement while producing recyclable materials and clean electric energy to be sold.

The RCBC WTE System is built from equipment that is common in the waste energy industries: conveyers, shredders, compactors, steam systems, turbine-generators and electricity management equipment. RCBC is the acronym for the unique Rotating Cascading Bed Combustor, the equipment that enables combustion of garbage to a 99.9% carbon burnout. The RCBC uses commonly known chemical and engineering principles to dry the shredded garbage and thoroughly combust it while minimizing the creation of the key sulfur and nitrous oxide pollutants to eliminate the need for costly air pollution control processes. It is distinctly different from the old, environmentally-unfriendly incinerator systems built in past decades.

The RCBC technology was originally developed to enable the use of high-sulfur coal to produce steam and energy for industrial operations as new air quality standards were being enacted two decades ago. Early testing determined that the technology was ideal for use of other materials as fuels, including garbage, and many organic industrial and agricultural wastes. The standard RCBC WTE System engineered for disposing of municipal solid waste can be easily modified to dispose of other waste streams; the core technology, steam and electrical components stay the same, only the fuel preparation and delivery components are modified.

In recent years, two other technologies have been proposed for eliminating waste: gasification and plasma. Both are significantly more costly than the RCBC system in construction and operation. While gasification has been used for small-scale specialized production, neither technology has been shown to be technically viable with municipal waste, nor have they been proven in large commercial scale operations.

The standard size RCBC WTE System will process 300 tons per day of municipal solid waste and deliver 6 MW of electricity. To put this into human perspective, one unit will process the waste of 90,000 U.S. homes or up to a population of 400,000 in emerging market countries, and deliver enough electricity to serve 10,000 - 20,000 U.S. homes or 30,000 - 70,000 homes in emerging market countries. Larger deployments are enabled by adding RCBC units.

The RCBC systems are designed and supplied from the United States and can be engineered for municipal environments anywhere on the globe.

• Statement based on engineering and economic assessments by independent engineering firms of commercial offers in 2011 and 2012 and by independent tests of RCBC system operations during commercial operation.

• System provided by Quality Recycling Equipment, Inc. Hendersonville, NC USA +1.828.696.2694

Waste to energy; uses are unlimited.

Thank you,

Bryan Ray
www.qualityrecycling.com
bryan@qualityrecycling.com
1-800-696-2110

Posted January 8, 2013 11:11 AM


FirstPrevNextLast
Horizontal Ruler

Post A Comment

Disclaimer
Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that Solid Waste & Recycling has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published and those that are published will not be edited. However, all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Your Name (this will appear with your post) *

Email Address (will not be published) *

Comments *



* mandatory fields